.&!
Y 300
COPY
Chambers,
Hongkong, 16th. November, of
343
,devol dremntavoð
❤nos noff
dtonni¶ siloman” ~i? r1887
*admswol to reddel Isiotto “po nĨ
molarevs midion?wał zgonis na beɛasique avail. I dødt væa noy die
*
moteeseeng "t on dry of alda moart oras tenule now man am [artot
Baw unbratenshoir tardid a Jault set pont mos burrow Cotriw edust to
Ja hovia nd vibran bison bra Yaarsben
-ABTAVNO? a roma od roketers on evail I
orld Zuroris dienord + U quad zeom sd baobab biras
erait exerw JaŚr mend nad waly v
I bre
molt
*
.Ajsqloitas Hoy &*Imat
di svad of natteď saw at antog Istanavoranoo etia??sh emoɛ bev
-nno trebaɔst m od na Ukayn mitotni himo I did on goldbw al
•OONADNO@Renzon zo,adrebeoang bra anoftib
-dua vit harriot ever såntog dore vaali
-700 avon/rurlow v*n* s Atanongue odd el amoord har sariw to toet
Holdseteros et avait od stlesh brow now I • B: fshឌ *
.Ajab VĺMBA NA ARKANka od quorsshme II)w I of ratst wor
.CRASILT.0.4 (58)
Dear Sir Frederick,
I am obliged by your letter of the 13th, to which
I have given my best attention. The question has become rather a large one, and is so closely interlocked now with subsidiary
ones which have formed the subjects of much correspondence, that
it is almost impossible to disentangle them. At the time when
I so much wanted an unofficial talk much good could I think have
been done: now I doubt if one would be are good if it were pos-
sible to keep vaxed questions out of the way. And I deprecate
Emren
at this late hour an official discussion. It would involve a
very severe criticism of certain officers and others, which I am
most indisposed now to give expression to. I came to this
Colony full of interest in it, knowing the importance of the
position which the Chief Justice of Hongkong ought to hold.
Finding what I did find I determined to bring the Court as near
to the standard which I think it should attain to as the means
at my disposal allowed me, and I know that so far as the suitors
and the profession are concerned I have not failed.
But the
matter does not seem to have any interest for the Government.
My statements were disregarded, and even the statistics which
bear out those statements do not elicit any comment either from
yourself or the Secretary of State; and just at a time when
there is an excessive strain to get through work which required
two men to cope with, comes your statement in Council that others,
whose opinions have more weight than mine, tell you there is no
immediate necessity for another Judge. You will I think agree
with me when I say it is not encouraging; nor be surprised when
I tell you that energy and 'bonne volunte' are in a dying con-
dition.
But I have put up with it for 3-1/2 years; a little
longer can make little difference, and I propose to enjoy the
rest of my time here with as little official worry as possible.
Sincerely yours,
(Sgd) P.T.Piggott
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.